Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 05:15

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What questions would you ask to an AI?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Scientists Uncover Giant Spiders That Once Terrorized Jurassic Earth - The Daily Galaxy
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How Can I get a taxi company to outsource their Dispatch services to me?
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Do you have any fantasies you are ashamed of?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Measles 'exposure event' confirmed in Great Falls - KRTV
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
'No Kings' anti-Trump protests across US ahead of his military parade - BBC
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Apple’s Upgrades to CarPlay, iPad and Vision Pro Outshine Liquid Glass - Bloomberg.com